The Demi Moore bush pic is a thing of some fame. As a young actress Demi Moore decided to have some soft core (as we would call them now) pics taken. Not an unusual thing for a starlet on the make in Hollywood.
What makes them a little different is that, well, she's a great deal more famous now than she was back in the 80s, so the pictures are of a great deal more interest. Also, fashions have changed: women are now expected to look a little more pre-pubescent than adult. Thus the pictures of Demi Moore's bush strike some as odd: what, you mean adult women have hair? There?
Well, yes actually, adult women do indeed have hair there. Quite why society has decided that they shouldn't is something unknown.
But anyway, there you go, there's the Demi Moore bush pic in all its glory. Yes, there was a time when we actually expected women to look like that.
There's a longer piece on the Demi Moore bush pic here.
That's the change in the social mores: but that interesting question is why? What on earth has happened to make adult women decide that they should look like pre-pubescents? Hair there is, like hair on the chest of a man, a secondary sexual characteristic indicating sexual maturity. Why or how could there have become a social standard that one should not show that one is indeed mature?
